Over the past year on our blog we have been discussing generational differences and how these manifest themselves in workplace learning and motivation. How can we know which training providers are best placed to support our organisation, our people, our unique situation? And what are the parameters that matter, what should we be measuring. Here's an example.
The Energy Industry currently spends $6bn on training every year. Yet the difficulty is ensuring the quality of delivery and the capability, expertise and diversity of their vendors, to make sure all generations are supported. With the proliferation of training delivery modes, generational issues and the drive towards mLearning, in a crowded and diffuse market, how can we ensure that the training delivery is appropriate? How can we compare and differentiate?
We've been wrestling with the issue of how to create a comprehensive vendor standards framework. One that's simple, easy to understand and that assesses vendors against a strict and objective set of criteria to ensure that each organisation gets the maximum benefit from each training intervention.
The Prelude CALIBER RATING will allow each training provider to be quickly and objectively measured and compared in terms of capability, specialisations, generational-specific proficiency and value for money to allow the client to make the most informed decision when choosing a training provider, both pre and post procurement.
We'll publish the parameters shortly but we'd love to hear about others ways people have addressed this problem and also on any issues of generational learning.